Skip to main content
Startup StaffingSUS

Recruitment agency vs in-house recruiter

Recruitment agency or in-house recruiter?

This is a question about hiring volume and cash shape, not about which option is better. An in-house recruiter converts hiring into a fixed salaried cost; an agency keeps it variable and per-role. Most scaling companies end up with both, in that order.

Which approach fits us?Arrange a conversation

Side by side

Contingency agency and In-house recruiter compared on the things that change the decision.

AspectContingency agencyIn-house recruiter
What you are buyingAccess to a network and sourcing capacity for one role at a time.Dedicated capacity across every role you have, plus process and employer brand that stay in the business.
Cash-flow shapeVariable. Nothing until a hire, then a single fee tied to that hire's salary.Fixed. Salary and tooling every month, whether you hire two people this quarter or none.
Break-even thinkingSuits lumpy or occasional hiring, where paying per role costs less than carrying a salary through quiet periods.Suits sustained volume. Work out the roles per year you are genuinely confident of before committing to the salary.
Internal workloadYou own the brief, interviews and decision; sourcing sits outside.You own all of it, and you also manage, coach and equip the recruiter.
Specialist coverageYou can pick a firm per specialism, and change it if the market shifts.One person's expertise. Unusual roles often still go outside.
Time to useful outputImmediate — the network already exists.Ramp-up. Sourcing, tooling and pipeline take time to build from a standing start.
Candidate experiencePartly delegated, and varies with the recruiter you get.Yours end to end, which is a genuine advantage when it is done well.
Flexibility if the plan changesStop using them. There is no ongoing obligation for roles you do not run.An employment relationship, with notice and duty of care.

How to choose

Contingency agency tends to fit when

  • Your hiring is occasional, or clustered around funding rather than continuous.
  • The roles are specialist enough that one generalist recruiter would struggle.
  • You cannot carry a fixed salary through a quiet quarter.

In-house recruiter tends to fit when

  • You can name enough roles over the next year to keep a recruiter genuinely busy.
  • Employer brand and candidate experience are strategic for you.
  • You have a leader with the bandwidth to manage a hiring function properly.

The common pattern is not either-or. An in-house recruiter runs the repeatable roles and owns the process, while external partners are used for the specialist, senior or urgent seats their network reaches faster. If you go that way, the useful question becomes how the external fee is structured — which is where the monthly model differs from a placement fee.

Questions to ask before you commit

Contingency recruitment agency

  • What exactly triggers the fee, and what counts as an introduction?
  • What is the rebate scale, and is it a refund or only a replacement?
  • Is there an opt-out or transfer clause if we later hire the candidate for a different role?

Risks to weigh

  • The largest single cash outflow lands in the same month as the salary, the equipment and the onboarding.
  • Rebate windows are short. A leaver at month seven is normally your loss, not the agency's.
  • Effort is not contracted, so an unusual or slow role can quietly get deprioritised.

Internal talent acquisition hire

  • How many roles per quarter will we genuinely have for the next year?
  • Who manages and coaches this person, and against what definition of good?
  • What do we do about the roles that fall outside their expertise?

Risks to weigh

  • Hiring volume dips and you are paying for capacity you are not using.
  • One person cannot be a specialist in every function you need to hire.
  • You are hiring a recruiter before you have a recruiter to help you hire one.

Common questions

When should a startup hire its first in-house recruiter?
When you can point at a written hiring plan with enough roles across the next twelve months to keep one person busy, and you have someone senior who can manage them. Before that, the salary usually buys less hiring than the same money spent per role.
Can we use both an in-house recruiter and an agency?
Yes, and most scaling companies do. The in-house recruiter owns the process, the brand and the repeatable roles, and external partners are brought in for specialist or urgent seats. The main thing to agree upfront is who owns which role, so candidates never hear from two people.
Does an agency fee have to be paid as a lump sum at hire?
Not necessarily. A conventional contingency fee is invoiced at the point of hire, but monthly-fee models such as ours spread the recruitment fee across the time the employee stays. Both are legitimate; they simply put the cash in different places and carry different total-cost profiles.

Back to all six hiring approaches →

Keep reading